Lone Pine Capital LLC 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

已就緒Lone Pine Capital LLC · Stephen Mandel

登錄後可基於當前選中的策略克隆一個新分支，繼續在新分支裏調整參數與權重。

官方策略
用户分支
返回基金列表

Baseline

分析消息
分支：
Baselinetested
策略問答參考3 條參考問答

基於這隻基金最新一期數據預生成的問答，可直接作為對話上下文使用。

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a concentrated, cyclical stock-picking book with meaningful implementation drag from filing lag and turnover. The baseline artifact shows top-5 concentration at 31.57%, top-10 at 56.42%, and top-20 at 93.83%, led by VST at 7.43%, CVNA at 6.65%, LPLA at 6.55%, KKR at 5.64%, and AVGO at 5.30%. Sector weight is heaviest in Financials at 24.55%, Information Technology at 20.86%, Consumer Discretionary at 20.37%, and Utilities at 11.72%. The backtest also required 1,048 trades and 5.81 total estimated cost, with risk notes explicitly warning that delayed filing dates materially lag the manager.

↳Show me which baseline holdings and sectors drive most of that concentration risk.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The best example of the baseline trade-off is that its strongest excess periods were very strong, but several weak periods still interrupted the path. In recent period data, 2024-06-30 returned 30.70% versus 9.83% for SPY, a 20.88% excess return, while 2023-09-30 added 16.61% versus 10.11%, a 6.51% excess. But weak stretches were also material: 2024-03-31 returned -4.58% versus 2.31% for SPY (-6.89% excess), 2025-06-30 returned -3.40% versus 4.20% (-7.60% excess), and 2023-12-31 lagged by -3.37%. Turnover stayed elevated in both strong and weak periods, ranging from 24.71% to 49.57% in the recent sample, so the excess return came with active trading and uneven quarter-to-quarter results.

↳Plot the recent baseline excess returns against turnover to see whether higher activity actually helped.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

A user should inspect three things next: concentration, turnover, and whether the current leaders match their own tolerance for lagged 13F copying. Concentration is high with top-10 weight at 56.42% in the baseline artifact, and the current leaders are VST, CVNA, LPLA, KKR, AVGO, and MSFT. Turnover is also non-trivial, with quarterly turnover hitting 49.57% at 2024-09-30 and 42.85% at 2025-03-31, while the risk notes mention 1,048 trades overall. Finally, recent changes matter: the latest baseline view is still heavy in cyclicals and financials, and the public investor is acting after disclosure lag, which the artifact explicitly flags as a material risk.

↳Show me the baseline’s latest holdings changes together with turnover and concentration by quarter.
登錄後即可基於上方策略與右側數據，直接與 AI 對話分析。
登錄後開始對話…
可參考左欄策略與右欄數據。