Olstein Capital Management, L.P. 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

已就緒Olstein Capital Management, L.P. · Robert Olstein

登錄後可基於當前選中的策略克隆一個新分支，繼續在新分支裏調整參數與權重。

官方策略
用户分支
返回基金列表

Baseline

分析消息
分支：
Baselinetested
策略問答參考3 條參考問答

基於這隻基金最新一期數據預生成的問答，可直接作為對話上下文使用。

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a broadly diversified but still fully equity-risk portfolio with filing-lag implementation drag. In the artifact, top5 concentration is only 10.3%, top10 is 19.13%, and top20 is 34.68%, so single-stock concentration is limited. But the same baseline still produced beta 0.86, maxDrawdown -36.05%, 3,222 trades, and 1.649 totalEstimatedCost. The main exposure is therefore not name concentration; it is market downside plus lagged 13F replication costs without positive alpha.

↳Show me how the baseline’s diversification looked by sector and whether any sector repeatedly hurt returns.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The clearest recent evidence is that the baseline had a few positive periods but many modestly negative excess-return windows. In periodPerformance, 2023-12-31 delivered optimizedReturn 5.77% versus benchmarkReturn 4.96% for +0.81% excess, and 2025-09-30 delivered 4.17% versus 1.49% for +2.68% excess. But several periods still lagged: 2022-12-31 was -7.01% versus -0.25% (-6.76% excess), 2023-06-30 was -7.61% versus -1.77% (-5.84%), 2024-03-31 was -0.81% versus 2.31% (-3.12%), and 2025-06-30 was 0.25% versus 4.2% (-3.95%). That pattern explains the trade-off: diversification helped survival, but the lagged baseline often missed benchmark upside and still absorbed meaningful downside.

↳List the best and worst baseline rebalance periods with turnover and trade counts.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

The next thing to inspect is whether the user is comfortable with underperformance persistence after lag and turnover. Baseline weaknesses cite negative alpha and information ratio, while riskNotes highlight delayed 13F-style filing implementation and meaningful turnover. The turnoverSeries also shows several recent quarters in the low-to-high teens, including 16.44 at 2024-09-30, 15.78 at 2024-12-31, 14.15 at 2025-03-31, and 18.44 at 2025-09-30. Before accepting the baseline, a user should verify whether those lagged trades and recurring excess-return shortfalls are acceptable for their use case.

↳Show me the baseline’s turnover trend and the quarters where lagged implementation hurt excess return most.
登錄後即可基於上方策略與右側數據，直接與 AI 對話分析。
登錄後開始對話…
可參考左欄策略與右欄數據。