Jensen Investment Management Inc 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

已就緒Jensen Investment Management Inc · Jensen Investment Management

登錄後可基於當前選中的策略克隆一個新分支，繼續在新分支裏調整參數與權重。

官方策略
用户分支
返回基金列表

Baseline

分析消息
分支：
Baselinetested
策略問答參考3 條參考問答

基於這隻基金最新一期數據預生成的問答，可直接作為對話上下文使用。

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a relatively concentrated large-cap portfolio with a strong information technology skew and meaningful implementation lag. The strategy top 5 account for 30.43% and the top 10 for 47.79%, led by Microsoft at 9.11%, Apple at 7.63%, and NVIDIA at 5.97%. Sector weights are 36.61% Information Technology, 16.8% Industrials, and 13.94% Health Care. The backtest also warns that implementation was active, with 6,951 trades, total estimated cost 1.7017, and a turnover spike to 98.98% in one period, so copycat investors face both concentration and execution risk.

↳Show the baseline concentration and sector weights alongside the fund’s live disclosed holdings so I can compare them.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent baseline periods that best explain the trade-off are the weak but high-turnover stretches in 2025 and the mixed resilience in late 2024. In 2025-03-31, the baseline returned 2.71% versus 9.22% for SPY, a -6.51 point excess return. In 2025-06-30, it lost -1.69% while SPY gained 4.2%, for another -5.89 point gap, and turnover jumped to 31.23% with 300 trades. By contrast, 2024-12-31 shows the upside of the lower-beta profile: baseline lost -2.62% versus SPY at -3.63%, outperforming by 1.01 points. Those periods show the core trade-off: some downside resilience in certain selloffs, but weak participation in strong benchmark rallies and costly turnover when the manager rotates.

↳Plot baseline excess return versus turnover by period so I can see whether trading intensity helped or hurt.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

Before accepting the baseline, a user should inspect three things: whether the concentration is tolerable, whether the lagged implementation is realistic, and whether underperformance is concentrated in a few periods or structural. Concentration is material, with top 10 holdings at 47.79% and Information Technology at 36.61%. Implementation realism also matters because the strategy used 6,951 trades with total estimated cost 1.7017 and explicit 13F-style filing delays. Finally, the period data show repeated benchmark shortfalls in 2023-12-31 (-4.44 excess), 2025-03-31 (-6.51 excess), and 2025-06-30 (-5.89 excess), which suggests the negative alpha of -1.05 is not just a one-period anomaly.

↳Give me the worst three baseline excess-return periods and the holdings or sectors that likely drove them.
登錄後即可基於上方策略與右側數據，直接與 AI 對話分析。
登錄後開始對話…
可參考左欄策略與右欄數據。