Miller Value Partners, LLC 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

已就緒Miller Value Partners, LLC · Bill Miller

登錄後可基於當前選中的策略克隆一個新分支，繼續在新分支裏調整參數與權重。

官方策略
用户分支
返回基金列表

Baseline

分析消息
分支：
Baselinetested
策略問答參考3 條參考問答

基於這隻基金最新一期數據預生成的問答，可直接作為對話上下文使用。

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a concentrated, cyclical, small- and mid-cap heavy book with notable stock-specific risk. In the baseline artifact, top 5 holdings are 39.12%, top 10 are 60.22%, and top 20 are 87.97%. The biggest positions are NBR at 11.72%, LNC at 8.05%, GTN at 6.92%, TDAY at 6.28%, and QUAD at 6.15%. Sector weights are led by Financials at 21.47%, Industrials at 17.85%, Communication Services at 16.09%, and Energy at 14.85%, which means the portfolio is not broad-market neutral and is highly exposed to cyclical earnings sensitivity.

↳Break down baseline exposure by single-name concentration and sector concentration versus SPY.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent baseline periods show why the return profile is acceptable only if an investor can tolerate uneven excess performance. Stronger periods included 2023-03-31, when the baseline returned 12.96% versus SPY’s 7.90% for +5.06 pts excess, and 2025-09-30, when it returned 7.48% versus 1.49% for +6.00 pts excess. But weak periods were meaningful too: 2024-06-30 returned 5.35% versus SPY’s 9.83% (-4.48 pts excess), and 2024-12-31 returned -6.71% versus -3.63% (-3.08 pts excess). Turnover also spiked to 110.42 in 2024-03-31, showing that some alpha came with sharp implementation activity rather than smooth compounding.

↳Show me the baseline’s best and worst excess-return quarters together with turnover and trade counts.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

A user should inspect three things next: concentration, implementation friction, and lag risk. Concentration is high, with top 10 at 60.22% in the baseline artifact. Implementation is not trivial either: the backtest estimates total trading cost at 1.8225, with 1,306 trades, and turnover reached 110.42 in 2024-03-31. Finally, the baseline risk notes explicitly state that the strategy uses filing-delay implementation after 13F reporting lags, so even a good-looking backtest may be harder to capture in live investing. If those three issues are tolerable, the 9.41% annualized return and 0.71 beta may still be attractive.

↳Walk me through baseline concentration, turnover, and filing-lag risks before I consider copying it.
登錄後即可基於上方策略與右側數據，直接與 AI 對話分析。
登錄後開始對話…
可參考左欄策略與右欄數據。