SPY — State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

已就绪State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust · Michael Riley

登录后可基于当前选中的策略克隆一个新分支，继续在新分支里调整参数与权重。

官方策略
用户分支
返回基金列表

Baseline

分析消息
分支：
Baselinetested
策略问答参考3 条参考问答

基于这只基金最新一期数据预生成的问答，可直接作为对话上下文使用。

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a top-heavy large-cap portfolio that behaves a lot like SPY but with somewhat more single-name concentration. The baseline top 5 are 28.30% and top 10 are 38.83%, led by NVDA 8.01%, AAPL 7.09%, MSFT 6.35%, AMZN 3.96%, and AVGO 2.89%. Sector weights are also dominated by Information Technology at 35.48%, followed by Financials 13.72% and Consumer Discretionary 10.68%. The backtest risk profile stays market-like with beta 0.97 and max drawdown -18.86%, so this is not a low-risk alternative to SPY; it is a slightly more concentrated version of broad U.S. large-cap exposure.

↳Ask how much of baseline risk comes from its top 5 names versus its sector allocation.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The 2025 period data shows the trade-off clearly: the baseline kept tracking error low, but excess returns were small and inconsistent. It outperformed modestly in 2025-01 (+0.12 excess), 2025-02 (+0.24), 2025-05 (+0.23), and 2025-11 (+0.29), but lagged in 2025-06 (-0.36), 2025-07 (-0.35), 2025-09 (-0.36), and 2025-10 (-0.39). The sharpest drawdown in the full series occurred in early April 2025 when drawdown reached -18.86% on 2025-04-08, while recoveryDays is 54. Those numbers show why the baseline produced strong long-run return but only a modest benchmark edge: it stayed close to market moves almost every month.

↳Ask for a table of the best and worst baseline months versus SPY with turnover included.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

A user should inspect concentration, implementation, and benchmark-relative consistency next. The baseline risk notes flag a negative information ratio, top 10 concentration of 38.83%, 18,030 trades, and 100% initial turnover, while totalEstimatedCost is 0.323. Monthly turnover also commonly runs around 2.0 to 3.2 in the turnover series, including 3.18 in 2025-09 and 2.93 in 2025-07. That means the baseline is acceptable only if the user is comfortable with market-like risk, top-heavy tech exposure, and a strategy whose edge over SPY is small enough that trading frictions can matter.

↳Ask whether trading costs and concentration would erase the baseline’s small advantage over SPY in a live portfolio.
登录后即可基于上方策略与右侧数据，直接与 AI 对话分析。
登录后开始对话…
可参考左栏策略与右栏数据。