Tiger Global Management, LLC 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

已就绪Tiger Global Management, LLC · Chase Coleman

登录后可基于当前选中的策略克隆一个新分支，继续在新分支里调整参数与权重。

官方策略
用户分支
返回基金列表

Baseline

分析消息
分支：
Baselinetested
策略问答参考3 条参考问答

基于这只基金最新一期数据预生成的问答，可直接作为对话上下文使用。

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline means accepting a concentrated growth-heavy portfolio with real 13F lag risk. The baseline top 5 hold 43.68%, top 10 hold 65.27%, and top 20 hold 87.75%, led by GOOGL at 11.81%, MSFT at 9.4%, AMZN at 8.2%, NVDA at 7.29%, and SE at 6.98%. Sector exposure is concentrated in Information Technology at 31.06%, Communication Services at 31.03%, and Consumer Discretionary at 20.68%. The payoff has been strong at 18.63% annualized return and 7.27 alpha, but investors also take on a -33.94% max drawdown, 650 trades, and disclosure-lag implementation risk.

↳Show the baseline top holdings, sector exposure, and drawdown profile together.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent baseline periods that best show the trade-off are the strong excess-return quarters and the weaker quality-of-return quarters. In 2023-09-30 the baseline returned 18.31% versus 10.11% for SPY, an 8.21-point excess return, with turnover of 17.8 and 22 trades. In 2024-06-30 it returned 13.24% versus 9.83%, a 3.41-point excess return, with 19.88 turnover and 23 trades. But weaker periods show the cost of the strategy's cyclicality: 2023-12-31 returned only 1.27% versus 4.96% for SPY (-3.69 excess), and 2025-06-30 returned 1.16% versus 4.2% (-3.04 excess). These swings help explain why the portfolio still produced high alpha overall but also endured a deep -33.94% max drawdown.

↳Plot the baseline's best and worst recent quarters against turnover and excess return.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

Before accepting the baseline, a user should inspect three things: concentration, implementation drag, and recent changes. Concentration is high with 65.27% in the top 10 and 87.75% in the top 20. Implementation drag is not trivial because the backtest reports 650 trades and totalEstimatedCost of 2.727, and turnover reached 49.18 in 2023-06-30 and 23.98 in 2025-09-30. Recent holdings changes also matter because the latest disclosed positions are unchanged in the artifact view, meaning the baseline result reflects the disclosed portfolio as-is rather than an optimization layer. That makes the user decision mostly about whether the original sector and top-name concentration is acceptable after reporting lag.

↳Show me the baseline concentration, turnover history, and estimated cost in one view.
登录后即可基于上方策略与右侧数据，直接与 AI 对话分析。
登录后开始对话…
可参考左栏策略与右栏数据。