Lone Pine Capital LLC 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

준비됨Lone Pine Capital LLC · Stephen Mandel

선택한 플랜에서 새 브랜치를 복제하려면 로그인하고, 새 브랜치에서 계속 최적화하세요.

공식
사용자 브랜치
펀드로 돌아가기

Baseline

분석 메시지
브랜치:
Baselinetested
전략 Q&A 참조3개 참조 Q&A

이 펀드에 대한 사전 생성된 Q&A. 자신의 분석을 위한 참조 컨텍스트로 사용하세요.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a concentrated, cyclical stock-picking book with meaningful implementation drag from filing lag and turnover. The baseline artifact shows top-5 concentration at 31.57%, top-10 at 56.42%, and top-20 at 93.83%, led by VST at 7.43%, CVNA at 6.65%, LPLA at 6.55%, KKR at 5.64%, and AVGO at 5.30%. Sector weight is heaviest in Financials at 24.55%, Information Technology at 20.86%, Consumer Discretionary at 20.37%, and Utilities at 11.72%. The backtest also required 1,048 trades and 5.81 total estimated cost, with risk notes explicitly warning that delayed filing dates materially lag the manager.

Show me which baseline holdings and sectors drive most of that concentration risk.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The best example of the baseline trade-off is that its strongest excess periods were very strong, but several weak periods still interrupted the path. In recent period data, 2024-06-30 returned 30.70% versus 9.83% for SPY, a 20.88% excess return, while 2023-09-30 added 16.61% versus 10.11%, a 6.51% excess. But weak stretches were also material: 2024-03-31 returned -4.58% versus 2.31% for SPY (-6.89% excess), 2025-06-30 returned -3.40% versus 4.20% (-7.60% excess), and 2023-12-31 lagged by -3.37%. Turnover stayed elevated in both strong and weak periods, ranging from 24.71% to 49.57% in the recent sample, so the excess return came with active trading and uneven quarter-to-quarter results.

Plot the recent baseline excess returns against turnover to see whether higher activity actually helped.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

A user should inspect three things next: concentration, turnover, and whether the current leaders match their own tolerance for lagged 13F copying. Concentration is high with top-10 weight at 56.42% in the baseline artifact, and the current leaders are VST, CVNA, LPLA, KKR, AVGO, and MSFT. Turnover is also non-trivial, with quarterly turnover hitting 49.57% at 2024-09-30 and 42.85% at 2025-03-31, while the risk notes mention 1,048 trades overall. Finally, recent changes matter: the latest baseline view is still heavy in cyclicals and financials, and the public investor is acting after disclosure lag, which the artifact explicitly flags as a material risk.

Show me the baseline’s latest holdings changes together with turnover and concentration by quarter.
이 펀드의 전략, 보유 종목 및 리스크에 대해 AI와 채팅하려면 로그인하세요.
채팅을 시작하려면 로그인하세요…
이 페이지의 모든 전략 또는 데이터 포인트를 참조하세요.