Brave Warrior Advisors, LLC 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

준비됨Brave Warrior Advisors, LLC · Glenn Greenberg

선택한 플랜에서 새 브랜치를 복제하려면 로그인하고, 새 브랜치에서 계속 최적화하세요.

공식
사용자 브랜치
펀드로 돌아가기

Baseline

분석 메시지
브랜치:
Baselinetested
전략 Q&A 참조3개 참조 Q&A

이 펀드에 대한 사전 생성된 Q&A. 자신의 분석을 위한 참조 컨텍스트로 사용하세요.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline means accepting a very top-heavy portfolio with cyclical and financial risk concentrated in a few names. strategyViews.baseline.concentration shows top 5 at 52.07% and top 10 at 82.57%. The biggest positions are OMF 12.94%, SNX 11.75%, ELV 10.86%, SLM 8.59%, and AN 7.93%. SectorWeights are led by Financials at 41.55% and Consumer Discretionary at 16.59%, with another 11.77% in Information Technology. The baseline also comes with 13F lag and implementation drag, including 661 trades and 2.21 estimated cost in riskNotes.

Ask how much of baseline risk comes from top-5 concentration versus the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sector mix.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent quarters show why the baseline can post solid long-run returns but uneven relative results. In periodPerformance, 2023-03-31 was strong with 13.42% vs 7.9% for SPY, a +5.51% excess return, while 2023-09-30 added another +2.52% excess. But weak quarters offset that edge: 2024-06-30 returned 4.88% versus 9.83% for SPY (-4.95% excess), 2024-09-30 was -2.54% versus +2.76% (-5.3% excess), and 2025-03-31 was essentially flat at -0.01% versus +9.22% for SPY (-9.22% excess). Those swings fit the baseline summary of strong absolute returns with uneven benchmark-relative results.

Ask which holdings and sector tilts were most responsible for the strong 2023 periods and the weak 2024-2025 relative periods.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

The next thing to inspect is whether the concentration and drawdown profile are tolerable after reporting lag. The baseline has a -34.45% max drawdown, 166 recoveryDays, and 0.77 beta, so it was less market-sensitive than SPY but still suffered deep losses. Users should also inspect whether they are comfortable with the top 5 at 52.07%, the Financials weight at 41.55%, and the recent shift toward OMF, AN, MRP, and COF. Finally, turnover and trade burden matter: period turnover reached 20.28 in 2025-03-31 and totalEstimatedCost was 2.2084.

Ask whether the baseline still looks acceptable after stress-testing its top holdings, drawdown history, and filing-lag implementation risk.
이 펀드의 전략, 보유 종목 및 리스크에 대해 AI와 채팅하려면 로그인하세요.
채팅을 시작하려면 로그인하세요…
이 페이지의 모든 전략 또는 데이터 포인트를 참조하세요.