Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

준비됨Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust · Bill Gates

선택한 플랜에서 새 브랜치를 복제하려면 로그인하고, 새 브랜치에서 계속 최적화하세요.

공식
사용자 브랜치
펀드로 돌아가기

Baseline

분석 메시지
브랜치:
Baselinetested
전략 Q&A 참조3개 참조 Q&A

이 펀드에 대한 사전 생성된 Q&A. 자신의 분석을 위한 참조 컨텍스트로 사용하세요.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a very top-heavy portfolio with sector clustering and filing-lag implementation risk. In the baseline artifact, Berkshire Hathaway is 32.38%, Waste Management 21.10%, Microsoft 12.35%, and Caterpillar 12.08%; the top five total 83.41% and top 10 reach 96.49%. Sector weights are also concentrated in Industrials at 42.56% and Financials at 32.38%, with Technology another 12.35%. That structure helped produce 14.93% annualized return, but it leaves performance heavily dependent on a few names and delayed 13F replication.

↳Inspect the baseline topHoldings and sectorWeights together to see whether your main concern is single-name concentration or industrial/financial exposure.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent periods that best show the trade-off are 2024-12-31, 2025-03-31, and 2025-09-30. In 2024-12-31 the baseline returned 3.75% versus SPY at -3.63%, a +7.37 point excess return with only 7.03 turnover. But in 2025-03-31 it returned 4.76% versus SPY’s 9.22%, a -4.46 point excess result, and in 2025-09-30 it gained just 0.61% versus 1.49% for SPY with turnover jumping to 28.82. Those periods show the appeal of occasional strong downside-relative outperformance, but also the cost of lag, concentration, and turnover sensitivity when the benchmark leads.

↳Sort the baseline periodPerformance table by optimizedExcess and turnover to identify when the strategy helped most and when lag hurt most.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

A user should inspect three things next: concentration, turnover spikes, and the drawdown path versus SPY. Concentration is high, with top five at 83.41% in the baseline artifact. Turnover is usually moderate but spikes matter, especially 78.07 in 2022-09-30 and 28.82 in 2025-09-30, which can raise slippage and execution risk. Finally, despite beta of 0.78, max drawdown still reached -27.78, so the navSeries and drawdownSeries should be checked to understand whether that risk profile is tolerable for a concentrated 13F strategy.

↳Plot the baseline drawdownSeries next to turnoverSeries and compare it with SPY to see whether the concentration risk matches your tolerance.
이 펀드의 전략, 보유 종목 및 리스크에 대해 AI와 채팅하려면 로그인하세요.
채팅을 시작하려면 로그인하세요…
이 페이지의 모든 전략 또는 데이터 포인트를 참조하세요.