Baillie Gifford & Co. 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

준비됨Baillie Gifford & Co. · Andrew Telfer

선택한 플랜에서 새 브랜치를 복제하려면 로그인하고, 새 브랜치에서 계속 최적화하세요.

공식
사용자 브랜치
펀드로 돌아가기

Baseline

분석 메시지
브랜치:
Baselinetested
전략 Q&A 참조3개 참조 Q&A

이 펀드에 대한 사전 생성된 Q&A. 자신의 분석을 위한 참조 컨텍스트로 사용하세요.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Following Baseline means accepting the manager's disclosed sizing almost directly. Here that means moderate concentration rather than broad index-like exposure: top 5 27.02%, top 10 44.17%, top 20 62.95%, with NVDA 6.92%, MELI 5.93%, AMZN 5.74%, SHOP 4.25%, SE 4.18%, SPOT 4.09%. The baseline result is return 14.44%, alpha 3.52%, beta 0.82, Sharpe 0.85, Sortino 1.11, max drawdown -33.47%. That is the right reference case, but it is not automatically the safest case because the largest names and sector mix (Consumer Discretionary 28.81%, Information Technology 27.00%, Communication Services 14.93%, Health Care 9.65%) still dominate the realized path.

Compare Baseline concentration and drawdown with each screen.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The period rows show the character of the baseline. The strongest relative period was 2024-12-31 (-1.27% vs SPY -3.63%, excess 2.35%, turnover 11.70%); the weakest was 2025-03-31 (2.77% vs SPY 9.22%, excess -6.45%, turnover 13.11%). The latest rows (2025-03-31 (2.77% vs SPY 9.22%, excess -6.45%, turnover 13.11%); 2025-06-30 (-1.22% vs SPY 4.20%, excess -5.42%, turnover 10.56%); 2025-09-30 (0.44% vs SPY 1.49%, excess -1.05%, turnover 8.43%)) show whether recent results are confirming or reversing the long-term profile.

Rank recent baseline periods by excess return and turnover.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

Before accepting Baseline, I would inspect three things: whether NVDA 6.92%, MELI 5.93%, AMZN 5.74%, SHOP 4.25% still have current theses, whether recent changes such as no large named moves and no large named moves indicate a shift, and whether max drawdown of -33.47% is acceptable for the user's risk budget.

Review the largest baseline holdings and explain whether each still deserves its weight.
이 펀드의 전략, 보유 종목 및 리스크에 대해 AI와 채팅하려면 로그인하세요.
채팅을 시작하려면 로그인하세요…
이 페이지의 모든 전략 또는 데이터 포인트를 참조하세요.