VOOG — VOOG | S&P 500 Growth ETF 13F holdings and portfolio analysis

BereitVOOG | S&P 500 Growth ETF · Kenny Narzikul

Melden Sie sich an, um einen neuen Zweig aus dem ausgewählten Plan zu klonen und dann im neuen Zweig weiter zu optimieren.

OFFIZIELL
BENUTZERZWEIGE
Zurück zu den Fonds

Baseline

Analyse-Nachrichten
Zweig:
Baselinetested
Strategie-Q&A-Referenz3 Referenz-Q&A

Vorbereitete Q&A zu diesem Fonds. Als Referenzkontext für Ihre eigene Analyse verwenden.

baseline13FChat AI
What does directly following the disclosed baseline portfolio expose an investor to?

Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a concentrated large-cap growth portfolio dominated by a handful of tech leaders. The top holding is NVIDIA at 15.39%, the top 5 are 44.92%, and the top 10 are 62.53%. Information Technology is 51.82% in the baseline artifact sector view, with Communication Services another 11.42%. The backtest produced a 16.12% annualized return and 338.91% total return, but also a beta of 1.10, 20%+ volatility noted in the artifact weaknesses, and a -32.9% max drawdown. So the exposure is attractive upside from dominant growth franchises, but with meaningful single-name and sector dependence.

↳Ask in the app how much of baseline return came from the top 5 holdings versus the rest of the portfolio.
baseline13FChat AI
Which recent baseline periods best explain the risk-return trade-off?

The recent baseline periods that best show the trade-off are the weak early-2025 drawdown and the rebound that followed. In 2025-01-31 the baseline returned -4.19% versus SPY at -2.79% (-1.40 pts excess), and in 2025-02-28 it lost -8.46% versus SPY at -6.48% (-1.97 pts excess). That shows the cost of a beta-1.10 growth portfolio when leadership breaks. The rebound came in 2025-03-31 with +2.00% versus SPY -0.91% (+2.90 pts excess) and 2025-04-30 with +9.49% versus SPY +6.28% (+3.20 pts excess). Later periods such as 2025-07-31 (-1.70 pts excess) and 2025-10-31 (-1.94 pts excess) show that concentration can still hurt when momentum narrows or reverses. These swings explain why return is strong over time but drawdown and tracking risk remain meaningful.

↳Ask in the app to visualize these periods against changes in NVDA, MSFT, and sector concentration.
baseline13FChat AI
What should a user inspect next before deciding whether the baseline is acceptable?

Before accepting the baseline, the next things to inspect are concentration, implementation frictions, and whether recent changes fit your risk tolerance. The artifact shows 31,702 trades and totalEstimatedCost of 2.5324, plus turnover spikes such as 49.74 in 2024-12-31 and 40.34 in 2025-12-31. It also shows top-10 concentration at 62.53% and a top single-name weight above 15%. On the holdings side, major increases in Microsoft (+5.88 pts) and NVIDIA (+1.01 pts) amplified tech dependence, while several defensive names were exited. If those concentration and turnover patterns are uncomfortable, the baseline may not match the user’s preferred path even if long-run return is strong.

↳Ask in the app to compare baseline concentration, turnover, and costs against the screened alternatives side by side.
Melden Sie sich an, um mit der KI über Strategien, Positionen und Risiken dieses Fonds zu sprechen.
Anmelden, um zu chatten…
Verweisen Sie auf eine beliebige Strategie oder einen Datenpunkt auf dieser Seite.