Greenhaven Associates Inc 13F holdings and portfolio analysis
Melden Sie sich an, um einen neuen Zweig aus dem ausgewählten Plan zu klonen und dann im neuen Zweig weiter zu optimieren.
Baseline
Analyse-NachrichtenVorbereitete Q&A zu diesem Fonds. Als Referenzkontext für Ihre eigene Analyse verwenden.
Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a very top-heavy cyclical portfolio. In the baseline strategy artifact, GM is 24.33%, Toll Brothers 14.93%, PulteGroup 12.79%, and D.R. Horton 9.89%, pushing the top 5 concentration to 68.18% and top 10 to 88.68%. Sector weights are dominated by Consumer Discretionary at 68.59%, with much smaller allocations to Health Care at 9.02%, Information Technology at 7.84%, and Energy at 5.31%. That structure delivered 12.64% annualized return, but with beta 1.13 and maxDrawdown -55.89%, so the baseline is effectively a high-conviction housing-and-auto bet rather than a diversified 13F clone.
The recent baseline periods show a mix of strong upside bursts and sharp benchmark-relative setbacks. On the positive side, 2023-12-31 returned 14.19% versus SPY at 4.96% for +9.23% excess, and 2025-03-31 returned 17.67% versus 9.22% for +8.45% excess. On the negative side, 2024-09-30 returned -5.90% while SPY gained 2.76%, a -8.66% excess gap, and 2022-12-31 returned -8.25% versus -0.25%, a -7.99% excess result. Turnover also varied from just 5.59 in 2025-06-30 to 47.70 in 2024-06-30, showing that even with limited names, implementation timing and rebalance periods still create meaningful swings.
A user should inspect three things next: concentration, sector dependence, and lag-driven implementation risk. The baseline artifact itself flags that the top holding exceeds 24% and the top five are near 68%, while the holdings table shows Consumer Discretionary at 68.59% of sector weight. It is also worth checking how many trades and costs the replication needed: the baseline backtest includes 781 trades and totalEstimatedCost of 2.4502. Those details matter because the baseline already has negative alpha of -0.81 and maxDrawdown of -55.89%, so investors should confirm whether they are comfortable owning a concentrated delayed 13F strategy with weak benchmark-relative efficiency.