Jensen Investment Management Inc 13F holdings and portfolio analysis
سجّل الدخول لاستنساخ فرع جديد من الخطة المختارة، ثم تابع التحسين في الفرع الجديد.
Baseline
رسائل التحليلأسئلة وأجوبة مُولَّدة مسبقاً حول هذا الصندوق. تُستخدم كسياق مرجعي لتحليلك.
Directly following the baseline exposes an investor to a relatively concentrated large-cap portfolio with a strong information technology skew and meaningful implementation lag. The strategy top 5 account for 30.43% and the top 10 for 47.79%, led by Microsoft at 9.11%, Apple at 7.63%, and NVIDIA at 5.97%. Sector weights are 36.61% Information Technology, 16.8% Industrials, and 13.94% Health Care. The backtest also warns that implementation was active, with 6,951 trades, total estimated cost 1.7017, and a turnover spike to 98.98% in one period, so copycat investors face both concentration and execution risk.
The recent baseline periods that best explain the trade-off are the weak but high-turnover stretches in 2025 and the mixed resilience in late 2024. In 2025-03-31, the baseline returned 2.71% versus 9.22% for SPY, a -6.51 point excess return. In 2025-06-30, it lost -1.69% while SPY gained 4.2%, for another -5.89 point gap, and turnover jumped to 31.23% with 300 trades. By contrast, 2024-12-31 shows the upside of the lower-beta profile: baseline lost -2.62% versus SPY at -3.63%, outperforming by 1.01 points. Those periods show the core trade-off: some downside resilience in certain selloffs, but weak participation in strong benchmark rallies and costly turnover when the manager rotates.
Before accepting the baseline, a user should inspect three things: whether the concentration is tolerable, whether the lagged implementation is realistic, and whether underperformance is concentrated in a few periods or structural. Concentration is material, with top 10 holdings at 47.79% and Information Technology at 36.61%. Implementation realism also matters because the strategy used 6,951 trades with total estimated cost 1.7017 and explicit 13F-style filing delays. Finally, the period data show repeated benchmark shortfalls in 2023-12-31 (-4.44 excess), 2025-03-31 (-6.51 excess), and 2025-06-30 (-5.89 excess), which suggests the negative alpha of -1.05 is not just a one-period anomaly.