Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. 13F holdings and portfolio analysis
سجّل الدخول لاستنساخ فرع جديد من الخطة المختارة، ثم تابع التحسين في الفرع الجديد.
Baseline
رسائل التحليلأسئلة وأجوبة مُولَّدة مسبقاً حول هذا الصندوق. تُستخدم كسياق مرجعي لتحليلك.
Directly following the baseline means accepting an extremely top-heavy 13F clone with meaningful stock-specific risk. In the baseline strategy artifact, the top 5 holdings account for 89.03% of assets and the top 4 alone are Uber 21.48%, Howard Hughes 19.32%, Amazon 19.29%, and Meta 15.36%. Sector exposure is concentrated in Consumer Discretionary at 40.44%, Industrials at 22.17%, Real Estate at 20.19%, and Communication Services at 17.20%. The payoff is a 10.46% annualized return and 160.1% total return with beta 0.75, but the trade-off is a -37.16% max drawdown and dependence on a small number of names after a reporting lag.
The recent baseline periods that best explain the trade-off are the strong but uneven quarters in 2024 and the weaker, high-turnover stretch in 2025. The best recent period was 2024-06-30, when optimizedReturn was 12.87% versus benchmarkReturn 9.83% for 3.04% excess with only 8.41 turnover. But that strength was followed by 2024-09-30 at -0.44% versus 2.76% and 2024-12-31 at -7.10% versus -3.63%, showing how concentrated exposures can reverse. In 2025-03-31, turnover jumped to 56.39 with six trades, yet return was only 1.60% versus SPY at 9.22%, which highlights the lag and execution risk of trying to track a concentrated 13F.
Before accepting the baseline, a user should inspect three things: concentration, period-level consistency, and execution friction. First, the baseline top 5 concentration is 89.03%, so investors need comfort with a few names dominating outcomes. Second, periodPerformance shows a mixed pattern, with strong quarters like 2024-06-30 (+12.87%, 3.04% excess) but weak ones like 2025-03-31 (+1.60%, -7.62% excess) and 2024-12-31 (-7.10%, -3.47% excess). Third, the strategy uses 227 historical transactions and totalEstimatedCost of 2.1957, so users should ask whether delayed filing-based implementation still fits their horizon and trading tolerance.